The Colorado social studies and science CMAS has been a true wake
up call for the citizens of Colorado. I want to share this Colorado story as an
example of what will be replicated all over the country this spring as PARCC
and SBAC take hold. We have already seen it happen in other states - it
pretty much goes like this. The test results come back and the majority (70 to
80%) of the students fail the test. The community and the media come forward
with all sorts of possible explanations of why the scores are bad.
Jeannie Kaplan, former Denver school board member, and a
person I respect greatly, wrote a blog sharing
her thoughts on the dismal CMAS scores for 4th, 5th,7th, and 8th grade.
As she reviews the scores she asks, "Why would you say Social
Studies has been a long-ignored subject in Colorado public schools? If you
answered, “because Social Studies has NOT been tested,” you would be correct.
Which is pretty empirical evidence that our public schools are turning into
test prep institutions, rather than incubators of curiosity and developers of
life long learning. If the subject isn’t tested, educators are not allowed to
teach it, even if it is truly important in preparing one not just for college
and career readiness but for life readiness as well. How can we expect our
students to be productive citizens if they don’t know and appreciate the
history, socio-economics, geography, language, and cultures of the world’s
population?"
She states, ".......if you are not allowed to teach the
subject, children in any kind of school will not learn the subject. And if you
can’t speak, read and write English with fluency, you most likely won’t do well
on a test in English."
I agree with her on many things, but I want to share several
thoughts.
First - we knew what the results of the social studies and science
CMAS test would be BEFORE the results came back, so spending time
examining them only tells us what we already knew. So, it's really very cut and
dry. They set the cut scores at around 70% for science and around 80% for
social studies, therefore, we knew that only 20 to 30% of students would be
successful on the test, and therefore, that's what happened. And, if they
were successful we could assume that they were typically from neighborhoods
with high real estate value and/or at charter schools where students are kicked
out and they only keep those with high test scores.
Standardized test scores will always tell us zipcode, and
therefore, I ask - why do we keep examining them - which gives them value and
power?
Chris Tienken has done extensive research on standardized tests.
He states, " It goes without saying that there is
over 100 years of evidence that demonstrates that commercially prepared
standardized tests are influenced too much by out-of-school factors to provide
important results. The results we receive tell us more about the child’s home
life and neighborhood than what he or she is capable of as a human being.
Colleagues and I have spent the last several years using US Census Data to
PREDICT the test results on every NJ mathematics and language arts test in most
grade levels administered since 2010. We just completed the same research in
Connecticut. We have been able to predict the percentage of students scoring
proficient or above in a majority of the school districts in NJ and CT using
only community and family census data (Tienken, 2014)."
Once again, what do we find out from these scores? Zipcode.
He also states, "The teacher is still the best assessment
tool because classroom assessments are formative (immediate) in nature, and
over time they provide a cumulative, running record of achievement that is more
reliable than any standardized test. Maybe that is why high school GPA is a
better predictor of first-year college success and overall college persistence
than the SAT when controlling for wealth characteristics of the students
(Atkinson & Geiser, 2009).
Jeannie Kaplan states that teachers are unable to teach social
studies and science because only subjects which will be tested are taught, and
as a result, social studies and science CMAS scores are low.
I agree with Jeannie that the subjects tested are the main focus
for instruction - I do not agree that CMAS scores are low because they were not
taught.
If that were the case - then why were my school's scores low, not only in social studies and science, but also in math and language
arts? Does that mean our teachers taught nothing?
No. Once again, it tells us zipcode.
And let me share a bit more here. The teachers at my school last
year DID teach social studies and science. When we simply
look at test scores and analyze them, rather than talking to teachers, we get
very little information about what is going on in a school. Why don't
people ask teachers instead of wasting their time typing up and analyzing these
pointless test scores?
Back to my school and what we taught last year.....
I am the literacy coach at my school so I spend time in all of the
teachers' classrooms. I co-teach, model, work with groups of children, and
I get to watch teachers create and implement lessons with such skill and nuance, that only an experienced educator could truly see and understand all that is happening - much like watching a surgeon with only the experience of having surgery, versus observing as another experienced surgeon. I say this, because it's important that citizens understand and respect the skill of our teachers - and especially, respect the skill of teachers who are working in high poverty, under resourced schools.
Last year, I saw teachers at our school support children in creating amazing Colorado history projects. I watched the younger grades learn about community. I saw the fifth grade learn all about economics and prepare and attend a field trip at Ameritowne where they - for a day - become a community, with a mayor and with jobs in which they buy and sell products and learn about business and economy. I saw teachers and students delve into amazing inquiries around insects, endangered species, plants, crustaceans, and more. I saw the upper grades fold historical fiction into history lessons to support the students in seeing the relevance of these historical facts.
Last year, I saw teachers at our school support children in creating amazing Colorado history projects. I watched the younger grades learn about community. I saw the fifth grade learn all about economics and prepare and attend a field trip at Ameritowne where they - for a day - become a community, with a mayor and with jobs in which they buy and sell products and learn about business and economy. I saw teachers and students delve into amazing inquiries around insects, endangered species, plants, crustaceans, and more. I saw the upper grades fold historical fiction into history lessons to support the students in seeing the relevance of these historical facts.
Yet, my district, Aurora, had the worst scores, in the top ten
largest districts, on CMAS social studies and science for 4, 5, 7 and 8th grade.
And, not only that, my school's scores in math and language arts
placed my school back in turnaround status for the second time.
Again, does that mean we didn't teach math and language arts too?
No. But it does indeed tell us, once again, zipcode.
Approximately 70% of the students in Aurora Public Schools receive
free or reduced lunch. Our students come from more than 132 countries and
speak over 133 languages.
Let me share my school's story a bit more...and forgive me if my
anger comes out a bit in this next thread.
We are a turnaround school as a result of our low test scores. We
are considered a failing school. And that means that when I go to professional
development opportunities, I am viewed as a literacy coach in a failing school
- the implication being, I have failed my school. It also means
that parents get a letter that tells them our school is in turnaround
status and the implication being, that we are failing their children.
It also means that you get scrutinized and emotionally
stripped naked by folks from all over the state who want to figure out WHY you
are failing. If you're really unlucky, your school gets audited by absolute
strangers who interrogate you one on one and in small groups, asking questions
in an effort to reveal any deep dark secrets which might EXPLAIN WHY we have
failing test scores. They ask you questions which might pit staff against
staff. They want to know who gets along and who doesn't. They want to know if
you LIKE your colleagues and/or your principal. And they say with a smile, that
they are here to help. These auditors spend a few days in your building,
going where they want, when they want, and they write down pages and pages of
information about you and they tell you that this will HELP you. You might
discover that the person observing you teaching has only one year teaching
experience, as she smiles and jots down notes that will be added to the audit.
They leave, after a few days, with their secrets on reams of paper and write a
report on potential recommendations to "turnaround" your school.
When they finish interrogating you, you might find that you are shaking
and suddenly in tears - as though you have been violated and you aren't really sure
what. just. happened. You might find that the rest of the day you can't
talk without feeling a lump in your throat rise to the surface or perhaps the
hair on the back of your neck stands up as you think about what you'd really
like to say to these auditors who pose as "helpers."
And when you get the report, you may find it filled with words
like grit, perseverance, and college and career ready - and you will find it
void of any recommendations to protect your children from poverty - all at the
tune of around $30,000 for the audit. And you might be angry. You might want to
scream and lash out at every person who continues to give these test scores
VALUE. Because you know why the auditors are there - one reason - low test
scores. This is the reality for those of us in turnaround.
So, back to these low test scores and poverty, and a few
deep breaths on my part.
As we, a turnaround staff in a turnaround school, attempt to
refute the low test scores that everyone and their mother want to analyze, we
also scramble to piece together wrap around services for our school . We juggle
our current funding, grants, volunteers and more to attempt to provide
food for our 180 families who need weekend food bags. We try to make sure that
our homeless children, 36 of them, are safe and not sleeping in cars in below
freezing temperatures. We reach out to the community to find additional
services to support our children who suffer from anxiety, PTSD, and other
emotional and mental health issues to make sure they are safe and able to
function in society - inside and outside of school. We spend a lot of
time running to stop potential crisis in the school - such as children running
out of the building, children flipping tables and clearing a whole classroom,
children crying, screaming, biting, hitting, all as a result of dealing with
outside factors the children are coping with - situations that cause me to
shudder when I hear of them - situations of abuse, murder, neglect,
desperation, hunger, sickness and more. We work hard to figure out ways
to provide classes for parents. Our parents care. They love their
children. They love our school.
Poverty is expensive. And the system is set up to take advantage
of them, of us.
We also organize partnerships with community businesses to stock
our parent center with food and clothing. We open our library to the
public and we find grants to create a preschool center and parent library
within our school library. We seek out resources to add a playground and
flowers so that our school is beautiful - on the inside and outside. We want
our children and our families to be proud of our school and the learners and
teachers who learn, problem solve and create solutions and new ideas on a daily
basis, as we develop learners who will be productive problem solving citizens.
When the weather turns cold we make sure that every child has a hat, coat and
mittens.
As we try to do all this, we must also prove that we will get
better test scores - this part is very important. You must have a good
explanation and plan to get out of turnaround or they will make a plan for
you. If they make a plan for you, it's guaranteed you won't be in it and
the children will find themselves faced with a school disrupted -a school
filled with strangers and a school stripped of its culture and its way of life.
A school where only test scores matter; a school where they will feed them only
tests.
And all this time folks in the media - mainstream AND social media
- keep analyzing test scores. All this time folks keep spending time, words,
and energy to keep the focus on the test scores. Meanwhile we, inside the
school, look at the poverty, the large class size, the need for more books, the
need for more teachers, and we know what we need to do and we know how to do
it, but we are under resourced and so we do the best we can to piece meal
together a plan, hopefully get us out of turnaround status, while also creating
our own personal plan to protect our children from poverty (and there is no
funding for protecting children from poverty).
We watch the district usher in new social studies and new science
curriculum. We are not surprised when we see that the curriculum is written by
Pearson, who also wrote the CMAS social studies and science test. And we are
not surprised when items from the test appear directly in the curriculum.
We continue to give test after test after test while folks
continue to debate what these test scores mean. We don't bother to waste any
time looking at the test scores ourselves - other than what we are required
to do - and we try to focus our energy on supporting our students to thrive and
learn.
Yet, as I look back on this year so far, I can say that there have
only been two weeks out of this year in which I have been
able to focus 100% on the needs of the learners. Every other week has been
filled with some sort of required testing.
I am tired, so tired of leaders discussing the test scores. The
scores that do not inform my instruction. The scores that continue to tell us
that many of our children live in poverty.
And to be quite honest, having the time and energy to analyze test
scores is a privilege - while they continue to feed the students at my school
tests, and while we continue to struggle to protect them from poverty.
I ask this - as a teacher in a high poverty school where we DID
teach math, literacy, science, social studies, art, music, PE, social skills,
library skills and more - and we still have low test scores - I ask - please,
quit discussing these scores. Come and talk to us and we will tell you what we
need. We don't need outsiders analyzing our scores and deciding what
those scores mean for our school.
Ask us what we need. And I can promise you, these
standardized tests will not be on our list.
Here in Colorado the last two weeks seniors from affluent
communities have opted out/refused to take the senior CMAS test. They have
varying reasons for doing so, and I applaud all of them for refusing to take
the tests. But, I watch with sadness as we hear nothing about our students in
the high poverty schools refusing to take the tests. Perhaps we'll hear
more on this later, but as for now, it appears the seniors in my district
took the test. It appears that the seniors in Denver did as well.
And I ask this of Jeannie Kaplan, and all leaders in districts of
high poverty - why are we analyzing the scores when we realize they simply tell
us zipcode? Why aren't leaders in these communities supporting parents,
teachers, and students in understanding that these scores mean nothing? Why
aren't leaders supporting opt out/refusal of tests? Why did students in
Aurora and Denver have to comply and take this waste of a test while the high
school students in Boulder refused to do so?
I received a video from a high school in Denver in which they told
the seniors they would have prizes for them if they took the test - prizes
ranging from coffee mugs, clothing, gift cards, restaurant cards, up to 40
prizes so far she said! The woman speaking says to the seniors, "It's
going to be worth your while." Are you kidding me??? The insults are so
great I can't even go into it.
Why are we denying certain communities the information they need
to determine how they might reclaim their public schools?
How they might reclaim their education? How teachers might reclaim their ability to
actually teach?
If we aren't telling them this, then we are a part of the machine
that continues to propagate the false narrative that these scores mean
something and that these schools are failing.
The seniors who refused CMAS know that by denying them the data,
this test may very well go away. Big picture, it may change policy.
As an excellent teacher, teaching in an amazing school with expert
teachers and brilliant children, while scrambling on a day to day basis to
protect the children from poverty, and at the same time keep the corporate
reforms OUT of the school, I must tell you, I am angry that anyone is giving
any air time to these test scores.
Zipcode. One word. Now let's do something about it.
Refuse the tests, demand that the money be funneled to our
neediest schools and let's watch what happens. Just as we can predict
zipcode via test scores, I can predict what will happen when these children are
protected from poverty. Just watch us.
With great respect, I ask that we begin to educate the public. No
data = no profit. Let's return our schools to our communities. Take away their
data which predicts only zipcode and which continues the narrative of failing
schools. These schools are not failing. They are abandoned.
Our students in Aurora are every bit as brilliant as
students in Boulder. I demand that society recognize them for their brilliance
and I demand that society protect them from poverty.
With great respect, I ask leaders in all communities to educate
and act.
Demand an end to high stakes corporate testing and common core, which together, are
privatizing our public schools. Demand sampling, versus testing everyone. Demand that teachers be allowed to assess. Let's
deny them the data - support opt out/refusal and force the policy makers to create policies which truly
protect children from poverty and create equitable and democratic schools. And let's do this now - before PARCC arrives in the spring, and once again, proves
that our schools are failing. Think about the children in my school.
Think about the children in Denver. We have no more time to analyze test scores
while they suffer. As a teacher, I have refused to administer the PARCC this
year. I continue to support parents in opting out. I know we are at the tipping
point, and I know there are leaders out there who can help us tip this in the
favor of all children. Let's
do it.
Thank you, Peggy, for giving this inside picture, making our cause more tangible.
ReplyDeleteAre the 'cut scores' percentages or percentiles? ("They set the cut scores at around 70% for science and around 80% for social studies, therefore, we knew that only 20 to 30% of students would be successful on the test, and therefore, that's what happened.")
ReplyDeletePercentage *of* the answers is a raw score based on the questions themselves; percentiles rank the students compared to each other.
If actual understanding of information matters (I don't know; maybe just "writing a persuasive blog -- please don't bother about details!" is your philosophy, as it is for many), please clarify.
I put the link to all that information in the blog post. I would assume understanding information matters to everyone reading my blog. If you look at the word highlighted in the 6th paragraph it will take you to an article that also links to additional info. you might need.
Delete