As
a former public school teacher who knows a lot about authentic assessment, I am
always fascinated to read directives given by the likes of Mr. Harris, who
hasn't taught - yet can suggest a school closing based on standardized test
data - data that quite honestly, is worthless – if indeed you wish to know
about real student learning.
Mr. Harris,
CEO of
Mind
Trust, recently
stated that The Project School (as well as three other schools)
in Indianapolis should be closed, based on their low test scores.
The
research on test-based incentive programs shows that these
mandates do not raise student achievement, yet, this prized standardized test data
continues to be used to determine the success or failure of our public schools.
Standardized test data does tell us one thing - which students are living in
poverty. At TPS approximately 71% of the children receive free or reduced
lunch.
The Project School is a charter school, but it is an “old
school” charter school - the kind of charter that existed before profiteers
co-opted the concept. One can be quite certain that high stakes testing is not
a part of the TPS philosophy (note the word
PROJECT – not bubble sheet).
The mission of The Project School reads as follows:
"The
mission of The Project School is to uncover, recover and
discover the unique gifts and talents that each child brings to school
everyday. Our school works collaboratively with families, community members and
social service agencies to solve real problems, as well as create art for
public spaces. Students graduate from The Project School as stewards of the
environment with the will, skill, capacity, and knowledge to contribute to the
greater good."
Assessment components at
TPS include:
- Literacy
Assessments—conferences, interviews, anecdotal records, authentic student
work, Reading Miscue Inventory
- Math/Logical
Assessments—Investigations assessments, formal and informal teacher
created assessments, instructional rubrics
- P3 Ongoing Assessment—formal
and informal teacher created assessments, instructional rubrics
- Formal Standardized
Assessments—ACUITY,
ISTEP+
- Student Exhibitions
- Museum of Authentic Work
- The Culminating Event
- Electronic Portfolios
- Student-Led Conferences
- Project School Progress
Report
- Intensives
Quite
honestly, out of all the assessments listed above, the formal standardized
assessments are the least valuable and certain to represent the narrowest view
of what the students at TPS know.
Corporate
Education Reformers who are privatizing public schools these days use
standardized test scores because it is efficient and allows them to fail schools
with a cut and dry approach – look at the data – not the learner. If they bothered to look at the multitude of
assessments of REAL learning, it would be much more difficult to fail schools.
Imagine the growth you could demonstrate by looking at authentic student work,
conferences, anecdotal records and exhibitions - all found in the list of TPS
assessments. However, Mr. Harris has
never set foot in the door of TPS so he wouldn't see any of that. The real strengths, needs and next steps of
the students at The Project School are unknown to him.
Corporate
education reformers spout directives with no knowledge of teaching and
learning. I believe Mr. Harris has a degree in political science and is a
former attorney. Go figure. Same game, new name. Mr. Harris is a cookie cutter corporate
education reformer. He couldn’t evaluate
a reading miscue analysis or decipher the value of anecdotal notes if he
tried. He doesn’t know the learners at
TPS - their hopes, dreams and day to day
struggles. The educators at TPS know
these things, but their authentic teacher evaluation of the students does not
count in the world of high stakes testing.
I
admire TPS because they have attempted to focus on real learning and real
teaching in the face of high stakes testing.
While many schools have caved and resorted to focusing solely on test
prep, TPS has continued to follow their mission – that takes guts in today’s
fear-based public school system, thanks to cookie cutter prototypes such as Mr.
Harris who are charged with the overhaul of a school district.
Egos
are big in this fame game played by corporate education reformers.
Protecting the children of the 99% is
not. Children's lives are unnoticed and ignored. How frequently do you see the
story of a community destroyed by high stakes testing on the front page of your
local newspaper? Who reports the stories of these children whose lives
are disrupted due to school closure? Who
shares the children’s feelings when their future is thrown to the highest
bidder?
No
one in mainstream media reports these stories. Instead you see the bravado of
corporate education reformers who squish schools like bugs and smile for the
camera.
So,
if Mr. Harris gets his way, what will happen to the children at TPS? Does anyone care? Will it fuel the school to prison
pipeline? Where will the children go to
school? Will they join a new school
community focused solely on test prep?
Will they all be sorted and thrown in different schools, no longer
attending school with their neighbors? Will
the TPS community of families slowly fade as parents head in different
directions to take their children to school?
If
I know the parents of TPS like I think I do, I believe Mr. Harris is in for a
long fight. And I intend to publicize
what mainstream media will not.
Perhaps
Mr. Harris is suggesting shutting down schools to make room for new charters
headed to Indianapolis. Perhaps these
new charters require less overhead – such as Carpe Diem.
Six
Carpe Diem schools are indeed headed to Indiana. ALEC loves them. See chapter
five of their latest report card. Six
schools will soon arrive, focused on ALEC’s love of technology and lack of
teachers. This isn’t innovation – this is mind-numbing education delivered via
computer with a few teachers (4) left to fill in the regimented gaps. ALEC wants good little worker bees – not
movers and shakers like those found at TPS.
Our
country which prides itself on innovation is developing a generation incapable of thinking critically, conceptually or creatively. If Mind Trust were truly inclined to help the
children of Indianapolis they might just take that charter school incubator money and
funnel it into wrap around services at schools for children living in poverty. They might look at these schools which are
considered failing and really dig deeper than a bubble sheet by looking at real
assessments, such as those shared on the TPS website. If Mind Trust were really about preserving
and improving public education they would consult and respect the educators who
know the community, culture and needs of the learners. If Mind Trust cared about the children of
Indianapolis they would listen to the parents who love TPS and are proud of the
accomplishments of their children and their school. If you wonder why they don’t, well simply look
at the
money trail. Real
learning, real teaching and protecting children from poverty do not create profit.
The
likes of Mr. Harris and Mind Trust do.